May 4, 2008
First a word to my long
time readers of this blog...I'm sorry that for some time now, my
comments are no more frequent than weekly. Let me wax about
economics in philosophical terms. Time is our most important
commodity --we can't accumulate more of it (no matter how rich), we
can't store it, we can get it back. So in busy times, when the
commodity is in short supply relative to life's demands, we
ration. I hope to become a frequent contributor to the Hog
Blog again--perhaps this summer. In the meantime, thanks for
sticking around.
You do
understand that we don't have Inflation, right? Seems a lot of
people don't. Believe it or not, the biggest inflation
risk right now is not that food and energy inflation (which clearly
exists) spill over into the core consumptive mix, but that people's
perceptions lead them to behave as if we have Inflation. The
Fed is concerned about that possibility, but that's different from
it existing now--if it did, they wouldn't be cutting rates.
Few people ever actually look into economic statistics (that's OK,
that's what you have me for...you have your own time constraint
issues--I understand). But take a look at the
inflation
numbers for yourself, and you'll see the following (I've
included the decimal points so you can look up the figure on your
browser in case you can't follow where I pulled it from):
- Minus food and energy,
inflation (the average annual price change of personally
consumed goods and services, weighted by preference) stands at
2.4% (6th row from bottom, 4th data column).
That's on the upper end of the comfort zone, but is NOT considered
high inflation in the slightest.
- Gasoline only
makes up 5.215% of the spending mix. That's tiny
relative to amount of attention it gets in the press.
- Food and Energy
make up less than 1/4th of our expenditures (24.5%)
This week saw benign
job loss figures for last month, and a return to full employment (5%
unemployment). A month does not a trend make, but it sure
makes last month's apocalyptic headlines about unemployment look
silly. (Recall the Oregonian's headline "Brother, spare a
space in line." I still can't believe that. The
journalist who wrote that article should be compelled to run a
disclaimer: "I studied journalism, not economics, in college,
am too young to remember what real unemployment problems look like,
and will do my part to ensure that the Republicans aren't
allowed back in the White House.")
On March 13 (see
Blog
archive), the market was in a panicked state--unmatched
in this five-year cyclical Bull Market. Those kind of
opportunities bode well for stocks over the ensuing weeks, and I
predicted that the Market would make a "huge upward move shortly."
And so it did--the Market's up 12.5% from the low two days later--that's
a lotta love for seven weeks. And it's probably about
out of steam. Clearly, sentiment has turned around. The
American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey of
members (read: dumb money) reported a 60% BEARISH view back then,
and now it's about 25% BEARISH--both figures are extreme (and
consistently good contrarian indicators). So while, the
Market doesn't necessarily have to turn down imminently, and it may
continue higher--or not, the signal from March worked like a charm.
April
24, 2008
I like what's
happening. Financials are doing well, repeatedly, on
news that would normally be catastrophic for stocks. Banks
are repeatedly announcing earnings that are half--or less--of what
they were a year ago, and these announcements are often accompanied
by large write offs. And I've observed a number of earnings
numbers that also are below analyst estimates--another usual kiss of
death. What do the stocks do in the wake or their earnings
announcements? Rally! Again, that tells me we've turned
the corner on this longtime lagging market sector.
Expectations are just too darned low. So go out and acquire
a batch of financials? Not necessarily. I'd like to
see a few more weeks of confirmation--financials doing as well, or
better than, the broad Market. But what if we miss "the
move?" If the turn is for real, the opportunity will
be there for awhile. If it's not for real, then these stocks'
fortunes will turn shortly so you won't want to be in them.
Remember, this is a big bet. Financials make up about 20% of
the Market--it's the biggest sector. At the firm, we're still
devoid of the sector, but stand ready to welcome it back into the
portfolio.
So who's going to be
our next President? Still too early to say...regardless of
the match up, it looks like it will go down to the wire. But
the remarkably prescient trading markets on the outcome,
intrade.com and the like, give the edge to Obama. Here are the
most recent probabilities assigned to likelihood of who will be our
next President.:
Obama
47%
McCain
39%
Clinton
14%
Commodities are
starting to look bloated. As I understand it, the supply &
demand curve for Oil (and Gas) haven't changed much since the price
of Oil and Gas were 40% cheaper. The run up in prices are
therefore due to speculators. On the food front,
it's not that clear. But clearly, that appreciation pattern
seems unusual, and it may be short lived. (I'm looking into it
more now.)
Yet, despite what you
read, we really don't yet have broad inflation. Food
and Energy makes up less than 25% of most gauges of inflation.
Take it out, and the reading of the rest of consumer mix shows
benign inflation--just a bit above the 2% annual appreciate rate.
So, it does not yet appear that inflation has spilled over to the
rest of the system. Which makes sense--when food and energy
are expensive, it takes away from the rest of the funds to be
devoted elsewhere. And let me repeat a point I've made--that
you almost never hear--credit crunches are always deflationary.
April
20, 2008
The word of the week is
"hiatus." Say it with me...HI - AY - TUS. I
decided this week that I'm taking an indefinite hiatus from two
regular parts of my life. One is weekly weight training and
the other is commenting on residential real estate. Both
were becoming a pain in my ass. In the
former case, I'm referring to my low, low back pain that was
exacerbated by the leg press. And commenting on real estate
has become a tired activity and now I just feel like I'm piling on.
Enough.
More SHOCKING, BREAKING
NEWS!!!: "U.S. bankruptcies soared 38 percent
in 2007!!!!"
The minute I saw this, I
knew the press was taking us for a ride. So l looked up the
numbers:
2007
805,912
2006
617,660
2005 2,078,415
2004 1,597,462
2003 1,660,245
That number for 2006 was a
20-year low. 2005 saw a spike because of the tightening of
rules for filers. So at 805,000, yes we're up from 2006--an
artificially low year because of 2005. But we're at about half
the normalized level pre-2005. Hardly a case for the
Depression the press wants you to buy into.
THE
RICH
LIFE:
If you want to see some cutesy pictures, put to music, from our
recent sitting (and I don't know why you would, but what the heck?),
click
here.
April
11, 2008
The press wants us to
know that consumer confidence is perilously low.
This from Forbes.com today: "Consumer Confidence Crushed!"
This comes on the back of news that:
"The Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of
Consumers reported that its preliminary index of confidence fell to
its lowest point in 26 years in early April"
What does this tell us?
-
The Media wants more
than anything to rid of the White House of the Party in control
for the last eight years
-
The Media wants to
sell its product--in an increasingly competitive period.
-
The Media's been
successful in convincing the populace that the Economy is worse
than it is.
-
None of this
matters...Confidence readings are useless in predicting economic
activity or even consumer behavior.
But oh well...



Above are the gauges that
Don Hays shares with subscribers to his e-newsletter (and
it's a great letter pick up--sign up
here).
At any rate, I'll confess to deleting my emails from Mr. Hays
of late (due to limited time allotted for reading). But
IO checked in today and it was good to find someone as
outlandishly bullish as I. I can't speak to what's going
to happen this Summer and Fall, but between now and then I think
we're to be treated to very kind returns in the global market for
stocks.
And everything I see
continues to confirm that a substantial shift may be under way.
As mentioned last week, it implies that there's light at
the end of the credit tunnel. Additionally, it suggests that
the Market's laggards of the last year, may be its imminent
darlings. We haven't made a change to the portfolio in months
(to our credit), but I'm getting that inner tingling that suggests
it may be time for an overhaul. No reason to rush--I play
multi-year themes--but it's feeling like we're about look and feel
very differently.
April 4, 2008
To call the Fed
intervention in Bear Stearns a "bailout" is to show either a
complete lack of knowledge on the topic or bad faith via the
disingenuous use of the term in order to bolster a bailing out of
sorts for those mortgagees unable to make their monthly payments.
In many cases, it's a combination of both: those claiming
Bear was bailed out know little of the mechanics of the deal, but
see it as yet one more opportunity to point out how Wall Street
always comes out on top and the little guy always gets screwed.
Fortunately, the recent legislative attempts to bail out
irresponsible borrowers AND irresponsible lenders have failed to
garner the necessary votes. That's good...let the chips
fall where they may, even if it stings.
We MAY--let me repeat--MAY
be turning the corner on the Market and Homebuilders--and Financials
may not be far behind. That doesn't mean that we're out of
the woods economically, nor does it mean that Housing is near a
bottom--and it certainly doesn't mean we've seen the last of
Financial company write-offs and failures. What it means, if
I'm right, is that the forward-looking investment markets are seeing
light at the end of the tunnel for the economic contraction and home
building stability. Should those two events be out there in
the next 9-18 months, stocks will continue to move up in advance.
And were that the be the case, Financials should soon follow suit.
Notice the seeming basing pattern in Homebuilders.

If there was a way to
characterize my forecasts, it's "Usually early, usually right."
It's possible that the we have another material leg-down for the
Market, Homebuilders, and Financials. But in just this
last week, I've begun to notice a litany of reasons for making this
forecast.
March
30, 2008
The public is generally
hysterical about the "credit/sub-prime/housing crisis" and it's a
useless, unwarranted and naive response. If you consider
yourself in this camp, and want out, I suggest you develop real
knowledge quickly--if you feed yourself with the media's description
of what's going on, you'll be wont for serious, attitude-adjusting
medication.
I said coming into this
year that I thought it would see a turn in the Dollar. And I
want to reiterate my view in that regard, and update you on possible
timing:
-
Just like the
aforementioned credit market assessment, the dollar is being
made to big a deal off. I've found that a scant few of
those that try to speak with authority have very little
understand of exchange. I'm not just talking about the
entertainers that won't take payment in the Greenback, but those
flippant types that intend to ascribe cause and effect to trade
rate of the dollar.
-
If the dollar is "very
weak" now (and I don't buy that), then it was very strong in
2000 (at least relative to the Euro). And oh, by the way,
we're really only broken out of the Euro Trade range in the last
few months, and the Dollar is merely on the low end of the Yen
range.
-
Cheap dollars = Good
for Exports
-
The Dollar can't
bottom until we see the light at the end of the Fed easing
tunnel.
___________________________
HEDGEHOG ARCHIVE